Adventures in Machine Learning

Rev Up Your SQL Queries: Tips for Lightning-Fast Performance

Improving SQL Query Performance: Practical Tips for Faster Execution Times

Have you ever found yourself waiting for a SQL query to complete, only to realize that it is taking longer than it should? As a developer or analyst, slow query performance can be frustrating and can even hinder productivity.

However, these performance issues can often be mitigated or eliminated by making small changes to your SQL coding practices. In this article, we’ll explore several practical tips for improving SQL query performance.

We’ll discuss the importance of proper indexing, efficient data retrieval, avoiding performance issues with functions, using correlated subqueries, and improving LIKE pattern performance.

Proper Indexing

A common reason for slow query performance is the lack of proper indexing. Indexes can have a significant impact on query execution times, as they allow the database engine to access only the relevant data rather than scanning the entire table.

Here are a few tips for proper indexing:

– Identify frequently accessed columns and create indexes on them. This can improve access to data and reduce computation time.

– Be careful not to create too many indexes, as this can negatively impact insert, update, and delete operations, as well as increase storage space requirements. Assess the trade-off between query performance and other operations and optimize accordingly.

– Consider using a tool like “Use the Index, Luke” by Markus Winand, which explains in-depth how to create efficient indexes based on query patterns.

Efficient Data Retrieval

Another way to improve query performance is to retrieve data more efficiently. Here are a few tips for efficient data retrieval:

– Retrieve only the necessary columns using the SELECT statement.

If you don’t need all columns in a table, specify only those that are required, to avoid transferring unnecessary data across the network. – Consider limiting the number of rows returned using the LIMIT clause, particularly when dealing with large tables.

– Optimize filtering conditions in the WHERE clause to reduce the size of the result set. For example, put conditions that can benefit from indexes first.

– Use the correct comparison operator according to the data type, such as EQUALS for exact matches, IN or BETWEEN for non-consecutive integer values, and LIKE for pattern matches.

Avoiding Performance Issues with Functions

Functions have a significant impact on query performance, which can lead to full table scans. Here are a few tips to help avoid performance issues with functions:

– Avoid using functions in the WHERE clause, as this can cause a full table scan.

For example, use a condition like “date >= ‘2021-01-01’ AND date <= '2021-12-31'" rather than "YEAR(date) = 2021". - Be wary of using DATEDIFF() functions, as they can cause a full table scan.

Instead, use arithmetic operation to calculate the number of days, weeks, or months between dates, such as “(date2 – date1) / 7” for weeks or “(EXTRACT(MONTH FROM date2) – EXTRACT(MONTH FROM date1)) + 12 * (EXTRACT(YEAR FROM date2) – EXTRACT(YEAR FROM date1))” for months.

Correlated Subqueries

Using correlated subqueries can have a significant impact on query performance, as they execute the inner query for each row of the outer query. Here are a few tips for using correlated subqueries more efficiently:

– Consider using INNER JOIN instead of EXISTS for high-performance queries, as this eliminates the need for correlated subqueries.

– Use a subquery that returns a small result set, such as a single row or a small number of rows, rather than a large result set, as this can have a significant impact on query performance. – If possible, consider using a temporary table to store the results of a subquery and then joining the temporary table with the outer query instead of using a correlated subquery.

Improving LIKE Pattern Performance

When using the LIKE operator, the use of wildcard characters at the beginning of a search pattern can significantly impact query performance. Here are a few tips for improving LIKE pattern performance:

– Avoid using wildcard characters at the beginning of a search pattern, as this can cause a full table scan.

Instead, use them at the end of a search pattern or avoid them altogether. – Use regular expressions to search for patterns that can be expressed more simply using regular expressions, as this can improve query performance.

However, be wary of the additional overhead of parsing regular expressions.


As you can see, there are several techniques for improving SQL query performance. Proper indexing, efficient data retrieval, avoiding performance issues with functions, using correlated subqueries, and improving LIKE pattern performance can all have significant impacts on query execution times.

By implementing these techniques, developers and analysts can improve productivity and eliminate the frustration of slow query performance.

Efficient Data Retrieval: How to Improve Query Performance

In today’s age of big data, processing large amounts of information quickly and accurately is crucial. As a result, efficient data retrieval is essential when handling databases.

In this article, we will dive deep into the topic of retrieving data efficiently, with a focus on limiting the number of rows returned, retrieving only necessary columns, and the role of object-relational mappers (ORMs) in this process.

Retrieving Only Necessary Columns

A common mistake that both novice and experienced programmers make is retrieving more data than necessary. This can be avoided by retrieving only the columns that are required using the SELECT statement.

One important note is that this statement can translate to a different language depending on the system of choice. In SQL, the SELECT statement is utilized to query data from tables within a database system.

When a SELECT statement is run, it extracts data from a database table and returns the data in the form of a result set, which can then be processed within the application code. Retrieving only the necessary columns can greatly improve the performance of queries, especially when working with large tables, as it reduces the amount of data that needs to be transferred over the network, accessed from memory or disk, or processed by the database management system (DBMS).

The performance gain is proportional to the size of the columns retrieved. ORMs can also play a role in this process.

ORMs, such as Hibernate (for Java) and Entity Framework (for .NET), aim to abstract the details of database access from the application code by providing an object-oriented interface to the database. By using an ORM, the application code interacts with objects instead of raw SQL queries, which can considerably simplify the code.

ORMs can also manage the retrieval of only the necessary columns by flattening only the properties that are required from the object hierarchy.

Limiting Rows Returned

Another way to improve query performance is by limiting the number of rows returned. In SQL, this can be done using the LIMIT clause, which limits the number of rows returned by a query.

While some database systems, such as MySQL and Postgresql, support the LIMIT clause, others require different syntax. For example, Oracle uses the ROWNUM keyword to limit the number of rows returned, while SQL Server uses the TOP keyword.

Limiting the number of rows returned is especially useful when working with large tables that contain millions of rows. By limiting the number of rows returned, you can avoid loading the entire table into memory or processing it, which is time-consuming and may slow down the overall query performance.

Instead, you can use pagination to retrieve a subset of the data and display it on a user interface. ORMs can also help limit the number of rows returned by using the concept of lazy loading.

Lazy loading means that the ORM does not retrieve the entire object hierarchy upfront, but waits until the required data is actually accessed by the application code. This approach can improve query performance, particularly when a large amount of data is involved, as only the relevant data is retrieved.

Function Usage in WHERE Clauses

Functions in WHERE clauses can have a significant impact on query performance, as they can cause a full table scan. A full table scan occurs when the database system reads every row in a table instead of using an index, which can result in slow query execution times.

For example, using the DATE function to extract the year from a date column in the WHERE clause instead of a column like “year” could result in a full table scan. To avoid slow query performance, it’s essential to avoid using functions in WHERE clauses.

In some cases, you can replace them with arithmetic operations or flattening functions that can be executed during insertion or update operations. For instance, consider using an additional column for a “year” instead of extracting it from a date function to reduce the run time.

This way, the extracted year column will be indexed and easy to query.

Improving Performance by Avoiding Functions

As mentioned earlier, functions can cause a full table scan and reduce query performance. The best practice is to avoid using functions entirely, especially in WHERE clauses.

For instance, it is better to convert data to a different format before inserting it into the database, enabling efficient and optimized reading and writing of database content. To improve the efficiency of your code while avoiding the use of functions, try optimizing indexing structures.

Indexes provide a way to speed up the query performance of the database by allowing for more efficient access to the data. Proper indexing could boost performance by creating faster database searches, reducing computation time, and providing faster results.

When the indexing structure is optimized, queries can find relevant content using the search condition’s terms. This reduces the amount of scanning the table needs to do for each query and provides better query performance.


Efficient data retrieval is critical for query performance in database systems. We have discussed several ways to improve the query performance, including retrieving only necessary columns, limiting the number of rows returned, avoiding function usage in WHERE clauses, and improving overall performance by optimizing indexing structures and related schema.

Performance improvements can be further achieved via a more optimized database system configuration. By applying these best practices, developers can maximize the efficiency and performance of their databases and ensure the applications and platforms built on them perform optimally.

Correlated Subqueries: How to Optimize Query Performance

One common but often-overlooked cause of slow query performance is the usage of correlated subqueries. In this article, we will explore the concept of correlated subqueries, their impact on query performance, and how to avoid them, as well as provide a bonus tip on using the execution plan to optimize queries.


Correlated Subqueries

A correlated subquery is a subquery that depends on the outer query to execute. These subqueries execute once for each row of the outer query, leading to inefficiency and poor query performance.

Since the subquery depends on the outer query, the data in the subquery cannot be accessed until the outer query has fetched its data.

Here’s an example of a correlated subquery:



FROM employees a

WHERE a.salary > (SELECT AVG(salary)

FROM employees b

WHERE a.department = b.department);


In this example, for each employee row in the outer query, the subquery finds the average salary of all employees working in the same department, and returns only the names of employees whose salary is higher than the departmental average. This subquery executes once for each row of the outer query, making it highly inefficient.

Improving Performance by Avoiding

Correlated Subqueries

To avoid correlated subqueries and improve query performance, we can use EXISTS and INNER JOIN clauses. These clauses can be used to re-write the subquery as part of the outer query, thus reducing the number of times the subquery runs.

Here’s an example of a query that uses EXISTS:



FROM employees a


FROM employees b

WHERE a.department = b.department

AND a.salary > b.salary);


In this example, the correlated subquery has been replaced with an EXISTS subquery. The EXISTS clause checks if there is any row in the subquery result and returns true or false.

Alternatively, we can use INNER JOIN instead of EXISTS, as INNER JOIN eliminates the need for correlated subqueries entirely. Here’s an example of using INNER JOIN:



FROM employees a

INNER JOIN (SELECT department, AVG(salary) as avg_sal

FROM employees

GROUP BY department) b

ON a.department = b.department AND a.salary > b.avg_sal;


In this example, the subquery is replaced with a derived table “b” that calculates the average salary by department – this derived table is then used with the INNER JOIN clause to filter results. When working with complex queries, it’s also helpful to use temporary tables or common table expressions (CTEs) to simplify queries and reduce the number of subqueries required.

This approach can also make queries more readable and easier to maintain over time. Bonus Tip: Using Execution Plan to Optimize Queries

The execution plan is a useful tool for optimizing queries.

It provides information about how the query will be executed, including the order of operations, which indexes will be used, and any potential performance issues. To view the execution plan in PostgreSQL, we can use the EXPLAIN command before a query.

The output will show the plan used by the PostgreSQL optimizer to execute the query. By analyzing the execution plan, we can identify potential performance bottlenecks, such as full table scans or the use of slow indexes.

We can then take steps to optimize the query, such as adding or modifying indexes, changing the query structure, or adjusting the database model. In conclusion, reducing the usage of correlated subqueries is a critical factor for improving query performance.

Using EXISTS and INNER JOIN clauses provide an alternative to correlated subqueries. Finally, utilizing the execution plan enables database professionals to optimize their queries and identify potential performance bottlenecks.

Efficient SQL query performance is crucial for handling large amounts of data accurately and quickly. In this article, we covered several tips for improving query performance, including proper indexing, efficient data retrieval, avoiding performance issues with functions, optimizing queries by re-writing correlated subqueries, and using the execution plan for query optimization.

By applying these tips, developers and analysts can effectively improve productivity and avoid slow query performance. Remember to retrieve only necessary columns and limit the number of rows returned, avoid function usage in WHERE clauses, opt to eliminate correlated subqueries, and utilize execution plans to identify potential optimization opportunities.

Consider these tips when developing a database system and optimize your databases for efficiency and speed.